Archive for the ‘Chuck’ Category

This is just a fun thought experiment.
Dr. Richard Dawkins once said that, “On a scale of seven, where one means I know he [God] exists, and seven I know he doesn’t, I call myself a six.”

“Professor Dawkins went on to say he believed he was a ‘6.9’, stating:’That doesn’t mean I’m absolutely confident, that I absolutely know, because I don’t.’”

Under those conditions, the benefits of being an atheist could be defined as:

B= Y(.9857) – ∞(.0143)

.9857=probability of Dr. Dawkins being right

.0143=probability of Dr. Dawkins being wrong

B=Benefits of being an atheist

Y = years of living in bliss

∞ = years contemplating your error

What would logic and reason dictate under those conditions?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2105834/Career-atheist-Richard-Dawkins-admits-fact-agnostic.html#ixzz2Qje25nRS
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Read Full Post »

This chart epitomizes the definition of insanity according to Einstein, “[D]oing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Compare the duration of unemployment in the 70’s, when Nixon declared that, “We are all Keynesian now,” to the 80’s and 90’s when America had the largest economic growth during peacetime. Those 20 years of economic growth resulted during a time when taxes were dramatically reduced, entitlements were reformed, and the budget was balanced. It was not single party that brought this growth about, but a single idea. The idea that our country’s economic engine runs better when the private sector is in the driver’s seat. 

Unfortunately we currently have an administration that believes our economic engine should be driven by the government. It believes that money spent by the government will be better for the economy than money spent by the private sector. This chart is one of many examples of what happens when we take money out of the economy and allow it to trickle-down our government bureaucracy. Stagnation. And don’t worry, Stagflation will be here soon.

~ Chuck

Read Full Post »

So has anyone heard the one about Democrats imposing a 35% tax on health care benefits that range from $8,000 for individuals to $21,000 per family?You haven’t. That’s odd. I am sure the MSM would be discussing a plan that would essentially be one of the largest tax increases in our history and would essentially reduce health care benefits to many Americans. Hmmm…what else could they be reporting on?

Oh that’s right. Our President is on a marketing tour in Copenhagen ensuring his cronies in Chicago make a quick buck from the Olympics. Thank God the MSM is on top that story, since it has such an impact on so many Americans. … Ok, now back to Congress shenanigans.

So the Senate Finance committee wants to impose a 35% tax on employer-sponsored health care benefits that cross the above mentioned threshold. This will inevitably lead employer’s to reduce benefits, fire employees, or increase costs to consumers.

Now why would Congress purposely increase the cost of employer-sponsored health care  benefits at the determinant of the employees and consumers. It is possible that Congress is purposely increasing the cost of employer-sponsored health care benefits in order to garner support in the business sector for a public option. Congress could pitch the idea that employers could avoid the 35% tax through a public option. And if the public option is passed, employers will inevitably dump their employees into a public option in order to avoid the 35% tax.  Even though there is no viable explanation why employer-sponsored health care benefits should be taxed, I am sure Congress is acting in our best interests in and not in its interest of increasing its reach into our lives. 

~ Chuck

Language on the 35% tax is found on page 202. Happy reading.


Read Full Post »

“Cuba is hoping that private farmers can literally plow the island out of a huge $11 billion trade deficit this year caused by rising food import costs and falling exports. The policy marks a major shift away from inefficient state farms that once occupied the lion’s share of the island’s agricultural land.”

It took close to 50 years, but Cuba has finally realized the benefits of private enterprise and capitalism. Since the totalitarian take over of the island, Cuba has depended on government run farms and cooperatives for its agricultural production. Due to inefficiency, which is very surprising from a government program, more than 3/4 of the farm land on the island remained idle. The totalitarian government hopes that individual private farms will help the government get out of its current trade deficit of $11 billion. So if Cuba is turning towards capitalism to sustain its socialist economy, why are we turning towards socialism to sustain our capitalist economy. That kind of sounds “bassackwards.” 

The introduction of private farms is a step in the right direction for Cuba. I hope it is the first of many more to come.

Link to News Article: http://www.tampabay.com/news/world/article1028061.

Read Full Post »

Forget global warming. The greatest threat to human civilization is a zombie infection. According to recent study on infectious diseases, a zombie infection could potentially wipe out our civilization if not properly addressed. According to the study, the only viable solution to a zombie infection is instant eradication of the infected.  Which gives me an idea for a bumper sticker: “Save the Earth, Kill a Zombie.” Pretty catchy.

Here is a link to the article on the study. I tried to get a copy of the study, but it isn’t out yet.


And here is a little Bob Hope humor which is appropriate for this article and this blog:

Read Full Post »

According to the AP, President Obama played fast and loose with details. Who would have thought the AP actually still did journalism?

Here is a taste:

OBAMA: “We already have rough agreement” on some aspects of what a health care overhaul should involve, and one is: “It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you’re happy with it.”

THE FACTS: In House legislation, a commission appointed by the government would determine what is and isn’t covered by insurance plans offered in a new purchasing pool, including a plan sponsored by the government. The bill also holds out the possibility that, over time, those standards could be imposed on all private insurance plans, not just the ones in the pool.

OBAMA: “If we had done nothing, if you had the same old budget as opposed to the changes we made in our budget, you’d have a $9.3 trillion deficit over the next 10 years. Because of the changes we’ve made, it’s going to be $7.1 trillion.”

THE FACTS: Obama’s numbers are based on figures compiled by his own budget office. But they rely on assumptions about economic growth that some economists find too optimistic. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in its own analysis of the president’s budget numbers, concluded that the cumulative deficit over the next decade would be $9.1 trillion.


And let’s not forget his revalation that doctors will rip out a kid’s tonsil just for the money. So much for the Hippocratic Oath.


Read Full Post »

An excellent video showing what happened in Honduras. Our President called the interim government in Honduras illegal. For a man who held himself up as a constitutional scholar, he should study a nation’s constitution before calling the action of a sovereign nation illegal. If the U.S. allows Zelaya to come back into power, we have abandoned our cause for liberty and undermined the rights of a people.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.